OUCH - that's gonna leave a mark!
+++
Re: Ken Saborio: Darwinian Anomaly or Thalidomide Tragedy? 13-May-09 11:41 am
<
Hello 'Ken'.
Firstly, if you want to say something to "'Tim Ransom' at Investor Village", why not simply post it on Investor Village where I might actually see it? You could PM me there as well, if you're too timid to post. Not to mention that my nym here is my email address. Perhaps this whole "Internet" thing is confusing for you.
Secondly, for you to say that the comment in question somehow gave your "research" some "nice traffic" is just another of your baldly idiotic lies.
Consider this, brainiac: on IV, you have *30 minutes* to either edit or delete a post once you've posted it. I decided after posting it to edit it. This means that this "nice traffic" you are gibbering about had approx 15 minutes in which to happen. So, again, you make a complete and utter fool of yourself by posting yet another easily debunked lie. This is due to the fact that you simply aren't very bright.
Thirdly, the post contained two links, neither of which were to your "research". The first link was to a post on OOXML troll Alex Brown's blog. It is Alex saying to you:
<<@anonymous-insider
I'm not sure which is the less valuable: the tinfoil brigade's chunterings, or your commentary on it!>>
http://www.adjb.net/post/Notes-on-Docume...
I hardly see how a link to an objectionable little twat like Brown expressing that even he finds you tedious and annoying would have driven "nice traffic" to your site during the 15 minutes it existed.
The second link in the post was not to your site either. It was a link to a comment you made on webmasterworld 4 years ago about how thrilled you were with IE7, and how "you standards guys" are "terrorists". How is *that* supposed to have driven "nice traffic" to your "research", Ken?
No really: I'd like you to explain how a post that existed for 15 minutes that did not link to your site whatsoever is supposed to have driven some "nice traffic" to your "research".
You do seem fixated on the retarded idea that driving traffic to your "research" is going to somehow accomplish... something. Hence you spending untold hours Google bombing, etc.
Let me put reality into perspective for you, Ken. According to Netcraft, Groklaw is currently number 1613 of the most visited sites on the Internet. Your pointless archive of copy'n'pasted press releases is currently the 1001919th most visited site on the Internet. If you continue to spend 16 hours a day trolling newsgroups referring to yourself in the third person and linking to your site for the next 100 years, you may move up four more spots from where you are now to the 1001915th spot, currently held by tugjobqueens.com.
Good luck with that.
+++
